8 Comments

As Peter Drucker, the great management philosopher, said some 60 years ago, one always have to compromise in the end, because there are other forces than you. But if one doesn't aim at what one really wants, not what seems "realistic", the compromise will be worse than it needs to be. So the concept of non-reformist reforms may be a usable one.

However, one has to consider that the number of actors is nearly unlimited. The traditional "reformists" behaved as if they were the only ones that wanted reforms and tried the best they could to silence others. That was a bad strategy, because the reformists had to compromise in the end and when they did there were no others to take up the struggle for the next reform. Reformists have to learn that all who aim in the same direction as they are on their side and should be encouraged, regardless of the smaller print.

Expand full comment

I have recently bought a small farm and you are one of the people whose writing in some way influenced this decision. So far I'm enjoying the changes in my life that this has brought about: increased amounts of physical labor, feeling closer to nature, more interaction with neighbors, picking and taking care of fruit, etc. But it's only been one month; we'll see how it goes. Wish me luck! : )

Expand full comment

Gunnar, you have the ability to put into words the most important conclusions. They are totally in line with my own thoughts but I don't have the skills to put them into words like you. Thank you!

Expand full comment

A number of years ago I went to a seminar. One of the slides presented on the screen was the ecological planetary footprints of some countries. The only country close to one planet living per capita was India. Assuming that the calculation of per capita resource use for one planet living is accurate even with best practices and equitable distribution it represents a huge change of every day life for a typical European or North American. Even Costa Rica is over two planets if everyone lived like a Costa Rican.

I emailed a British organization that promotes one planet living - https://www.bioregional.com/one-planet-living If they had a description in concrete terms what Britain would be like in terms of industry, transportation, housing , agriculture, living standards, energy use and production in a one planet society. They didn’t know.

Expand full comment

Yesterday I delivered some Sunflower meal from our oil pressing to my Amish friends. They had gathered together the neighbouring farms and were cutting corn stalks for silage using a horse drawn ground driven machine. I arrived just at break time and the gals had brought cookies and coffee. It was wonderful to see the community working together and would continue going from one farm to another until all has been harvested. This particular farm was very impressive with the many changes they have made to become self sufficient supporting many generations and working with other farms to get the work done. -mat

Expand full comment

Thank you Gunnar for this. Plenty that has made me think, especially non-reformist reforms and the work less-consume less paradigm. It reminds me of David Fleming's intentional waste to deal with excess capital i.e. older societies would build a church, have a feast to deal with excess capital rather than reinvest it in further production which had the potential to be toxic and community breaking.

Expand full comment

Haven't read Flemmings, thanks for lead. James Suzman is to some extent into this in his book Work also, although his focus is labour and not capital, but they are more or less the same....

Expand full comment

Thank you for your work!

Your post reminded me of Eisuke Ishikawa's book, which I link to below.

Although the practice was intensive, it was cyclical and deeply wise.

I recommend it.

https://www.japanfs.org/en/edo/index.html

Expand full comment