Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jan Wiklund's avatar

As Peter Drucker, the great management philosopher, said some 60 years ago, one always have to compromise in the end, because there are other forces than you. But if one doesn't aim at what one really wants, not what seems "realistic", the compromise will be worse than it needs to be. So the concept of non-reformist reforms may be a usable one.

However, one has to consider that the number of actors is nearly unlimited. The traditional "reformists" behaved as if they were the only ones that wanted reforms and tried the best they could to silence others. That was a bad strategy, because the reformists had to compromise in the end and when they did there were no others to take up the struggle for the next reform. Reformists have to learn that all who aim in the same direction as they are on their side and should be encouraged, regardless of the smaller print.

Expand full comment
Elin's avatar

I have recently bought a small farm and you are one of the people whose writing in some way influenced this decision. So far I'm enjoying the changes in my life that this has brought about: increased amounts of physical labor, feeling closer to nature, more interaction with neighbors, picking and taking care of fruit, etc. But it's only been one month; we'll see how it goes. Wish me luck! : )

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts