To let lynch mobs or social media platforms restrict free speech is a bad idea. I am rather present on a platform that has minimal censorship than one that will censor content regardless of on which grounds it would censor. As most of my readers have noticed, I rarely write about other politics than those concerning food, farming and environment and a tad of civilization critique. That doesn’t mean that I don’t have views about other politics, on the contrary. Don’t get me going over the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the war in Gaza, increasing inequality, how to combat climate change, global development, Sweden’s membership in NATO.....
Living in a rural setting with farmers it is very important to learn how to communicate with someone who does not agree with you. I'm organic but some of my friends are conventional chemically. We both recognize that we are interested in having agricultural sustainable. So my conventional friends brag about the less chemicals they use and I brag about how little hay my horses eat. So we learn to get along.
Much politics has degenerated into moral positioning, or moral posturing. "I am the good guy, he is the bad guy; whatever I do is Right and whatever he does is Wrong". That isn't helpful at all.
There are two strands in popular politics. One is the tradition from medieval peasant and artisan risings: We are the people. The other is the tradition from medieval anti-clerical heresy: Bearing witness against sin. I think the latter has been allowed to run too dominant lately. There has been too much moralism, too much smugness, too much prudishness, and too little popularity.
A short description of sdg 9 (not 13 as the title says). It is total fascism alright.
And anyone talking about it get in close contact with the shaming, censoring and guilt by association that is the tools of totalitarian parasites. youtu.be/-xQ4BW4wZcg
Censoring is what totalitarian fascists do. If one accept it and even demand it, is like saying you need a handler. Someone else has to tell you what knowledge you can read or listen to.
G3P is fascism. Global public private partnership. Agenda2030 is a g3p - project by UN and WEF. Nobody has ever voted for Global government.
I have a slightly more positive view on the UN than you have (not as a global government, but as a global platform). I have worked with various UN agencies. I don't think the UN is driving much, it is more reacting to initiatives by others. The Agenda 2030 is a hotchpotch of stuff without coherence, and as limited value as its predecessor(s).
Public private partnership has SOME commonality with fascism, at least on its view of economics, but I would not agree that it IS fascism.
Living in a rural setting with farmers it is very important to learn how to communicate with someone who does not agree with you. I'm organic but some of my friends are conventional chemically. We both recognize that we are interested in having agricultural sustainable. So my conventional friends brag about the less chemicals they use and I brag about how little hay my horses eat. So we learn to get along.
Much politics has degenerated into moral positioning, or moral posturing. "I am the good guy, he is the bad guy; whatever I do is Right and whatever he does is Wrong". That isn't helpful at all.
There are two strands in popular politics. One is the tradition from medieval peasant and artisan risings: We are the people. The other is the tradition from medieval anti-clerical heresy: Bearing witness against sin. I think the latter has been allowed to run too dominant lately. There has been too much moralism, too much smugness, too much prudishness, and too little popularity.
A short description of sdg 9 (not 13 as the title says). It is total fascism alright.
And anyone talking about it get in close contact with the shaming, censoring and guilt by association that is the tools of totalitarian parasites. youtu.be/-xQ4BW4wZcg
Censoring is what totalitarian fascists do. If one accept it and even demand it, is like saying you need a handler. Someone else has to tell you what knowledge you can read or listen to.
G3P is fascism. Global public private partnership. Agenda2030 is a g3p - project by UN and WEF. Nobody has ever voted for Global government.
I have a slightly more positive view on the UN than you have (not as a global government, but as a global platform). I have worked with various UN agencies. I don't think the UN is driving much, it is more reacting to initiatives by others. The Agenda 2030 is a hotchpotch of stuff without coherence, and as limited value as its predecessor(s).
Public private partnership has SOME commonality with fascism, at least on its view of economics, but I would not agree that it IS fascism.